• If I subtract 2 StereoDepth frames from each other how to output in OpenCV

@erik how about if the depth has a more narrow field of view than RGB? Are the calcs returned N/A?

  • erik replied to this.

    AdamPolak it will scale/pad the depth frame. So if FOV is lower, it will pad it with "0" values (which means invalid depth).

    6 days later

    hello Adam, have you succeed in subtracting 2 depth frames in device yet?

      jeremie_m

      Yes I have.

      Turns out the issue was that the model I created was expecting the input I entered for the StereoDepth.preview size.

      But instead the depth frames output at the resolution you provide for the depth.

      Let me know if you have any questions I know it pretty well now.

        AdamPolak

        Thank you Adam, I have questions about the model 'diff_images_simplified_openvino_2021.4_4shave.blob', is it generated by the pytorch code here?

        AdamPolak This is the pytorch code.

        Is it still using the dummy input or the depth input here is the result of the subtraction?

        AdamPolak def forward(self, depth):

          AdamPolak depthFP16 = 256.0 * depth[:,:,:,1::2] + depth[:,:,:,::2]

          Is the subtraction executed here?

          jeremie_m

          1. This is the "final" version to do a diff between 2 depth map images:
          #! /usr/bin/env python3
          
          from pathlib import Path
          import torch
          from torch import nn
          import blobconverter
          import onnx
          from onnxsim import simplify
          import sys
          
          # Define the model
          class DiffImgs(nn.Module):
              def forward(self, img1, img2):
                  # We will be inputting UINT16 but interprets as UINT8
                  # So we need to adjust to account of the 8 bit shift
                  img1DepthFP16 = 256.0 * img1[:,:,:,1::2] + img1[:,:,:,::2]
                  img2DepthFP16 = 256.0 * img2[:,:,:,1::2] + img2[:,:,:,::2]
          
                  # Create binary masks for each image
                  # A pixel in the mask is 1 if the corresponding pixel in the image is 0, otherwise it's 0
                  img1Mask = (img1DepthFP16 == 0)
                  img2Mask = (img2DepthFP16 == 0)
          
                  # If a pixel is 0 in either image, set the corresponding pixel in both images to 0
                  img1DepthFP16 = img1DepthFP16 * (~img1Mask & ~img2Mask)
                  img2DepthFP16 = img2DepthFP16 * (~img1Mask & ~img2Mask)
          
                  # Compute the difference between the two images
                  diff = torch.sub(img1DepthFP16, img2DepthFP16)
          
                  # Square the difference
                  # square_diff = torch.square(diff)
          
                  # # Compute the square root of the square difference
                  # sqrt_diff = torch.sqrt(square_diff)
          
                  # sqrt_diff[sqrt_diff < 1500] = 0
          
                  return diff
          
          # Instantiate the model
          model = DiffImgs()
          
          # Create dummy input for the ONNX export
          input1 = torch.randn(1, 1, 320, 544 * 2, dtype=torch.float16)
          input2 = torch.randn(1, 1, 320, 544 * 2, dtype=torch.float16)
          
          onnx_file = "diff_images.onnx"
          
          # Export the model
          torch.onnx.export(model,               # model being run
                            (input1, input2),    # model input (or a tuple for multiple inputs)
                            onnx_file,        # where to save the model (can be a file or file-like object)
                            opset_version=12,    # the ONNX version to export the model to
                            do_constant_folding=True,  # whether to execute constant folding for optimization
                            input_names = ['input1', 'input2'],   # the model's input names
                            output_names = ['output'])
          
          # Simplify the model
          onnx_model = onnx.load(onnx_file)
          onnx_simplified, check = simplify(onnx_file)
          onnx.save(onnx_simplified, "diff_images_simplified.onnx")
          
          # Use blobconverter to convert onnx->IR->blob
          blobconverter.from_onnx(
              model="diff_images_simplified.onnx",
              data_type="FP16",
              shaves=4,
              use_cache=False,
              output_dir="../",
              optimizer_params=[],
              compile_params=['-ip U8'],    
          )

          Important to note! This does not take in dynamic image sizes. It must be a certain size. For some reason dynamic dimensions are not supported. So these 2 lines:

          # Create dummy input for the ONNX export

          input1 = torch.randn(1, 1, 320, 544 * 2, dtype=torch.float16)

          input2 = torch.randn(1, 1, 320, 544 * 2, dtype=torch.float16)

          Define what size of depth images are coming in. change 320 (height) and 544 (width) to your actual depth image size.

          1. These lines are what changes the depth input from U8 (1 byte) to U16 (2 bytes):

          depthFP16 = 256.0 * depth[:,:,:,1::2] + depth[:,:,:,::2]

          The reason is because the depth image comes into the model at U16. We then convert it to U8 when it enters the model. We tell the nn to do that by this compile command: compile_params=['-ip U8']

          So the data comes in twice as big because it changes from U16 to U8. It needs twice as many bytes to represent the image. What that operation does is a little trick to turn the U8 data into FP16 data (which is required by the NN). So what that does is it unconverts the input data back from U8 to U16 (in this case FP16).

          What is your use case, do you also want to diff a "control depth" from new depth or something else.

            AdamPolak

            Thank you Adam, that helps a lot!

            I thought the image size is always the same once the camera config is fixed.

            And the transforms from U16 to U8, then unconverted to FP16, the procedure seems tricky.

            I will try to understand the dynamic dimensions and the procedure of transform.

            In fact, my case is just as your 'control depth', I want to make a subtraction of 2 successive depth frames to find the moving pixels, but I'm not so skilled at the NN model, and the subtraction must be done by NN model in the device.

            Adam, you help a lot 😃

              jeremie_m

              You are right, the image is the same size once it is fixed. I just meant that if all of a sudden you wanted to increase/decrease resolution on your depth frame to improve, you would need to create a new model.

              Heads up, you need to have quite a lot of depth filters enabled to make this diff work, the original depth frames are too noisy without post processing.

              And when you do basically any type of depth processing, like MedianFilter, it slows down the depth FPS to ~9-11.

              But it will take your diff from this (no processing):
              (2 identical frames, nothing moved in the scene)

              to this (median filter 7x7 and high_density):

              To this ( a lot of processing):

                AdamPolak quite a lot of depth filters enabled to make this diff work

                Thanks, Adam, 9-11 FPS maybe enough for me, I have to try to make the filters work in the host if the rate is too low.

                Is the config of depth filters is set as you mentioned in the code here or it's more complex than the parameters here?

                AdamPolak This is the depthai code

                jakaskerl

                Thank you for reply.

                1. As the subtraction of depth frames as we mentioned here.

                2. Selection of the farthest or nearest area of pixels in depth frame.

                3. Mask of specific shape from or to depth frame.

                  (4. Some NN models use both depth and RGB image maybe.)

                  .etc

                  Some thoughts for now, thank you 😃

                • erik replied to this.

                  jeremie_m does the code Adam provided above not work? Besides the tutorials we have on documentation / depthai-experiments, we don't have any additional ones.

                    erik

                    Thank you erik.

                    I'm not sure if the first code works, cause it doesn't match the inputs with the second code.

                    And I'm looking into how to generate the shave.blob, I'm not clear in processing the NN model.

                      13 days later

                      AdamPolak

                      Hello Adam, I've add the following process for the inputs, but it seems something not right.

                      Could you let me know how to adapt the depthai code.

                      Thank you Adam.

                      script.setScript("""
                      old = node.io['in'].get()
                      while True:
                      frame = node.io['in'].get()
                      node.io['img1'].send(old)
                      node.io['img2'].send(frame)
                      old = frame
                      """
                      )
                      script.outputs[
                      'img1'].link(nn.inputs['input1'])
                      script.outputs[
                      'img2'].link(nn.inputs['inout2'])