@erik @jakaskerl just an update, my integration was not successful. I got the footprint wrong for the SOM, basically ass about and the only way I could tell that is by examining the number of differential pairs leading from my board and comparing it to the DD2090.
I'll be fixing it but it would have been really great if there was a "luxonis correct" KiCAD footprint for this part if the plan is for users to easily integrate it into their own designs, it would have saved me some significant number of work. At the moment I wouldn't recommend people try, as the documentation is too sparse/non-existent. e.g. there is no footprint in the datasheet.
Before I send this off for production, I would really appreciate an "idiots guide"footprint for the the SoM-Pro. Even a PDF will suffice.
cheers
Peter
EDIT: It seems that the actual error is in the hole layout. As the A an B headers are not marked in the datasheet mechanical layout, the hole locations given in the datasheet really have no good reference. I think I could reverse the SOM to test the rest of my circuit just the holes wont line up.
EDIT2: Actually I don't think my pin numbering is correct… so really need that "idiot's guide" footprint.