Luxonis-Vlad Thanks for the information. Reading between the lines, perhaps over-pessimistically, I see large changes in architecture, significant development, significant testing, and a significant documentation effort. Based on what I've experienced in my career as a SW and HW developer (tho I'm long retired), it could be many months before "the new RAE" is ready for those of us who want an underlying platform that is stable, works reliably with reasonable performance, facilitates fast iterative development, and is well-documented, so we can do what we want to do. Luxonis, in my opinion, achieved that quite well with the original OAK-D, which is why I was excited to get a RAE. Unfortunately, my experience with RAE so far has been quite frustrating. It is unstable, not well documented, and doing the simplest, mundane things is like paddling through molasses.
I first started trying to use RAE 5 months ago, and managed to get it into a state from which I recently found could be fixed only with a factory reset. Other tasks caused me to put RAE on the shelf. Now, 5 months later, I've spent over a week and have made almost no progress in terms of actually developing my own application. It seems to me I might be better off putting RAE back on the shelf for another 5 months, hoping the new architecture will be usable at that time. Does that make sense?
