Hello all, this is my first post - I backed the OAK-D-WIFI Kickstarter back in 2020 but it's only now that I have found an application for my device. I plan to mount it to the front of my Quest 2 VR headset so that I can investigate mixed-reality applications based around things within arms' reach. For example musical instruments, printed circuit boards, Rubik's cubes, that sort of thing.
Having dug around looking for documentation and found the OAK-D-IoT-40, I'm wondering whether that device would be better suited to my intended application, given the much shorter ideal depth perception range (min. 40cm vs. 75cm). On the other hand, the 75mm camera spacing of the OAK-D-IoT-75 means that the left and right cameras are much better suited to being shown directly on the HMD displays.
Of course since I don't really need the WiFi (I can connect the camera to the headset via USB) there might be other OAK-D cameras that would be a better fit, like the OAK-D-SR.
Can anyone comment on the depth perception of either camera at short distances? Any other comments about these two cameras for my intended use case? Cheers, John :P