Comparison between RealSense and OAK-D.

Wilbur

In terms of depth accuracy, OAK-D seems to be less precise than RealSense (as shown in the diagram below).
Is it reasonable to draw such a conclusion?
Since world coordinates require conversion through Z, the accuracy of Z seems to impact the overall precision.
Are there any methods to maintain an overall FPS of 60 while ensuring accurate conversion?"

jakaskerl

Hi Wilbur
From my depth testing of OAK-D and RS435 and 455 the, oaks were overall more accurate than realsense devices.
You could be experiencing a badly calibrated device (even after calibration some devices perform worse; we are working on improving the calibration model).

Wilbur Are there any methods to maintain an overall FPS of 60 while ensuring accurate conversion?"

I'm pretty sure the spatialLocationCalculator node is fast enough to run at 60FPS (mono cameras at 400p).

Thanks,
Jaka