Hi, I am using OAK-D to analyze golf ball's flight path. So 120 fps of images is very important. I am testing using: python3 depthai_demo.py -cam left -monor 400 -monof 120 -dnn -dd I get about 70 to 90 fps only using a I5 CPU with USB3.0 hub. I have monitored the USB traffic on OAK-D, and it's about 22 ~ 23 MB/sec only. So it seemed it's not the USB3.0's 5Gb thal lower the fps. And I have disabled depth and AI by -dd,-dnn. Do I need a I7 faster PC to get 120 fps? But why? I have turn off depth and AI, it seems I do not need to do much calculation to use a I7 CPU. Or there's any switch to set to get 120 fps? Currently I need raw images only, is the firmware on OAK-D slow down fps?

Hello @"frankshieh"#323 , so the reason behind this issue is the XLink - protocol that we use between host/device. With the new version of depthai `2.10.0.0`, we have increased XLink packet size which will improve throughput by quite a bit - I am able to get **117.3 FPS** running the code above. We haven't updated depthai_demo to 2.10.0.0 but will do today (you can do it yourself by changing `depthai==2.10.0.0` in `requirements.txt`) Thanks, Erik

@"erik"#p1792 Hi, I have tested new depthai==2.10.0.0. Yes it helps , but not a lot. I can run to about from 80 fps to over 90 fps. If I add -usb usb2 to lower USB data rate then I can get 103 fps. The data rate over USB when using MJPEG compression reduced from about 23MB to 14MB. But I still can not get nearing 120 fps. The previous stereo camera we used, I can get 200 fps easily using a I3 computer just as it has USB3. The call back function we hook on to get every frame and won't miss any frame just as we do not install too many background running apps. We were using C++ and running the call back function as high priority thread so we almost did not lost any frames. This is important for us NOT to lost any frames. As we are analyzing golf ball flying with over 150 mph speed, the ball images in a swing catched might as low as 3 ~ 5 images. Lost any might let us failed to analyze ball's speed and direction. I do not know what's the bottlenecks that keep OAK-D from getting 120fps when running depthai_demo.py? I think your computer must be a high end PC, so I guess if I get a I7 will still lost some frames. Do you think it's caused by Python being interpreter and using C++ will help? Please advice, thanks!

Hello @"frankshieh"#p1802, I don't think it's possible that frames would drop - I believe the only limitation is the throughput of the XLink. We are adding support for USB 3.2 10GBPS (superspeed+) so if you have a host that supports that, it would definitely help. My host isn't anything special, but it does support USB3.2 (superspeed). From my observations your host/USB cable doesn't support USB3 so you get the same FPS with USB2 mode; could you try running [rgb_preview.py](https://github.com/luxonis/depthai-python/blob/main/examples/rgb_preview.py) (it will print the USB speed to the terminal)? Using USB3 should solve your issues. Thanks, Erik

[URL=https://i.imgur.com/cYogg6s.png][IMG]https://i.imgur.com/cYogg6s.png[/IMG][/URL] I am using USB3.0. I will buy a USB3.2 (superspeed) pci add on card to try and post the result. [URL=https://i.imgur.com/Djju8p0.png][IMG]https://i.imgur.com/Djju8p0.png[/IMG][/URL] This is the result running: python3 .\depthai_demo.py -s left right -monor 400 -monof 120 -dnn -dd It's still using 44MB/sec (using HDD Device Monitor Studio 8.36) which is still far less than typical USB3.0 transfer maximum speed 320MB/sec. It seems OAK-D has not yet got too heavy loading on USB3.0 bus, but I will try USB3.2 to see the result. We are replacing previous stereo cameras on our existing systems with OAK-Ds. And these existing PC we used Intel NUC which has no PCI socket to add and only with USB3.0 ports. If only with USB3.2 to get near 120fps, that means we have to use new NUC with USB3.2 to replace old USB3.0 NUCs. So, that why I am checking can USB3.0 to get 120fps or not. And we do appreciate Luxonis can help us on this!

Odd that it's not going faster. Could try UVC to debug as well but it's a bit of work to get running. Here are our UVC results with Gen1 and Gen2 USB3: https://docs.luxonis.com/en/latest/pages/faq/#what-are-the-highest-resolutions-and-recording-fps-possible-with-depthai-and-megaai [URL=https://i.imgur.com/LjA1TAB.png][IMG]https://i.imgur.com/LjA1TABh.png[/IMG][/URL]

Oh also IIRC 118FPS is currently the max framerate on the global shutter grayscale right now. And also there may be some error in counting the framerate as well that could be impacting here.

@"franva"#314 Please check out the following PR/branch : https://github.com/luxonis/depthai/pull/468 Run as: `python3 depthai_demo.py -s left right -monor 400 -monof 118 -dnn -dd --xlink_chunk_size 0` This results in 118 FPS. Some details FYI: https://github.com/luxonis/depthai-core/pull/199

hi @"GergelySzabolcs"#p1812 I think you meant to be tagging @"frankshieh"#323 ????

@"franva"#p1815 Yes, my bad. Autocomplete.. Sorry about that

Why I can not get 120 fps while USB3.0 only use 23MB/sec traffic?

erik

Hi thedead ,
I tried with this code: python3.8 depthai_demo.py -s right -monor 400 -monof 118 -dnn -dd -xls 0 -gt cv and I am able to get around 118FPS. If left mono stream is also enabled, then I get about 90FPS on both left/right streams. Thoughts?
Thanks, Erik

« Previous Page